It helps user understand the vocabulary on which the other standards in the series are built as well as provides relevant examples to show the way in which each concept works in practice. A complete knowledge bank, the can also be considered to be the foundation of IEEE software testing standards.
Some of the topics that are included in this series are introduction to software testing, testing processes in SDLC, risk-based testing , common test practices, defect management, etc. As per this standard, the testing process will work on a three-layer process that would include organizational test specifications such as organizational test policy and test strategy, test management and dynamic testing. Designed on the basis of BS component testing standard, this standard covers a number of dynamic software testing techniques such as equivalence partitioning, classification tree method and boundary value analysis.
These keywords are based on a set of actions that are required to be performed using specific steps in a test case. Writing keywords in a natural language helps one gain an easy understanding of these test cases. Implementing these standards may enable companies to deliver better products in the market, a lot of these are encouraging to follow authentic and reliable software techniques and approaches as a whole.
Conclusion Software testing standards are a must as it serves a validation for customers as well as the owner the testing company in ensuring that software testing is meeting certain standards. Ultimately these standards will make sure that customer is happy and the testing company is getting good reviews. A win win situation for everybody. Software deployment refers to the process of making the application work on a target device, whether it be a test server, production environment or a user's computer or mobile device.
DevOps is a methodology and a set of best practices for software development whose primary goals are to shorten delivery times for new software updates while maintaining high quality. In the DevOps framework, there are seven steps in the software development process:. DevOps especially emphasizes the use of automation to streamline the software deployment process.
DevOps usually incorporates a framework known as Continuous Integration CI where new code is integrated into a shared repository by working teams on a regular basis, sometimes even several times per day. Newly integrated code can be tested through an automated build process to support early bug detection and removal, helping to ensure that releases contain only quality code with few or no errors.
Continuous Deployment CD describes a software release strategy where new code passes through a battery of automated tests before being automatically released into the production environment where users can interact with it. Continuous deployment works best for software development teams that have invested heavily in automated testing that helps ensure new code is production-ready as it is developed.
Frequent integrations of new code and automated testing are crucial to effective continuous deployment. Developers that use CD also depend on real-time monitoring to help detect performance and operational issues once code has been deployed to the live environment. Every organization must develop its own process for software deployment, either basing it on an existing framework of best practices or customizing a process that meets relevant business objectives. Software deployment can be summarized in three general phases: preparation, testing and the deployment itself.
In the preparation stage, developers must gather all of the code that will be deployed along with any other libraries, configuration files, or resources needed for the application to function. Together, these items can be packaged as a single software release.
Developers should also verify that the host server is correctly configured and running smoothly. What is installshield or Wise are snapshot tool. When you snapshot any software: 1. You are no longer support by the manufacturer 2. You are stripping all "intelligence" from the setup. Many exe contains at least 1 MSI. You should not repackage a MSI so Everyone can snapshot and create a MSI. Not everyone can create a really good MSI, you will need course and even with that A few years ago there was a webcast on this site about to repackage or not and the conclusion was interesting.
Personnally, I think repackaging tool are for manufacturer not for company. All companys should package with MSI not at our level. Utter tosh. You are no longer support by the manufacturer This is a BAD thing?!?!?! Most vendor support isn't worthy of the title. Does anyone who's paying for support from - for example - Adobe think that it's worth the money? The ulitmate oxymoron - "vendor" and "intelligence". As for differences between builds, that's where pre-UAT testing comes in.
Many exe contains at least 1 MSI Only an idiot would fail to test for that, after the first dialog appears. Ya think?!? No argument there. In the 'x' years I've been doing this stuff, I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of vendor stubs which I have allowed to be used "as is". Here we go So I can provide a different ways to the end-user installs the package, making sure it is the same package installed.
You have your opinion. I have mine. I don't want a debate. I created myself hundreads of package probably like you and most are batch files. When needs, I created MST and sometimes winbatch. I think there is place for everything winbatch, autoit, batch, wise, installshield , you should just take the good tool for the each problem. It is a mistake thinking a single tool is the best solution for all problems.
I never said I was allowing a manufacturer installation with nothing else done. With batch file, you can let the manufacturer setup run and after taht changing a registry key value or anything else you need. This is not the point. You can also create a MSI and use it as a wrapper : It is true that manufacturers are frequently creating poor setup. But the manufacturer "know" what he wants to be done during the setup process.
Not you. So if he is doing sothing bad and you MSI is just taking a snapshot then it is possible you create a bias on another bias. What is good with batch is let the setup run and then correct what is wrong. That maybe true and if you are happy using Winbatch or whatever to deploy software using vendor setup routines then great. I think you are forgetting a number of key features of using Windows installer accross the board.. Good question! I was waiting for it: 1 - I can do a package that can be postpone for the user, if the user chose it I can put a systray and show a ballon every x time to the user nagging that the time is expiring to install the package; 2 - I can do it the same way to reboot.
If the package require a reboot at the end of the installation, I can give the user an opportunity to postpone the reboot, passed x time that was set in the AutoIT code the systray will nag the user and if the time expire an OK button will be show to user forcing the reboot. PS: the client do not have the option to preserve the configuration.
E opens. To detect and close the IE if the user is using before the installation is easy, but what you do if the user start the IE during the installation? Yes, I can lock, the iexplore. There is a lot of more! I hope this can answer your question Posted by: bkelly 12 years ago.
Goood Marketing. Would you really create a MSI for a allusers shortcut? A batch would be easier! General Checklists. Database Checklists.
The author of this template bears following credentials:. Your Company is in Phase.. This eShop is operated by Services Concept Whitepapers.
0コメント